Celebrity influence ranking
Composite influence score from news, search, fan signals, positive impact, and brand momentum.
Filter2▾
- #1
Lee Se-young97.400–Fan engagement remained steady
Fan SignalSearch Trend - #2
Lim Young-woong97.100–Positive Impact boosted by recent donation coverage
Positive ImpactDonation+1 - #3
IU96.500–Brand momentum dipped after the campaign ended
BrandAd Campaign - #4
Park Bo-young95.900–Search-volume spike drove the overall lift
Search TrendFan Signal - #5
Jun Ji-hyun95.100–Coverage of public-good campaign participation
Public GoodPositive Impact - #6
Kim Soo-hyun95.000–Increased tier-1 media coverage
DonationESG - #7
Lee Chanwon94.900–Steady fan-signal accumulation
Fan Signal - #8
Hwang Jung-eum94.700–Shift in search volume detected
Ad CampaignPositive Impact+1 - #9
Yoo Hai-jin94.500–Multiple matched signal labels
Ad CampaignPositive Impact+1 - #10
Jeong Dong-won94.300–Multiple matched signal labels
Ad CampaignPositive Impact+1 - #11
Ji Chang-wook94.100–Steady fan-signal accumulation
Fan Signal - #12
Ha Jiwon94.000–Multiple local-volunteer pieces
Positive ImpactPublic Good - #13
Gong Myoung94.000–Coverage of a public-good campaign
DonationESG - #14
Chae Jung-an93.900–Tier-1 media coverage dipped
Media Momentum - #15
Shin Hae-sun93.900–Coverage of a new brand deal
Fan Signal - #16
Kim In Seong93.600–Increased tier-1 media coverage
DonationESG - #17
Lim Ji-yeon93.500–Day-over-day coverage volume declined
Media Momentum - #18
Jeon Somi93.400–Coverage of a new brand deal
Fan Signal - #19
Kim Go-eun93.300–Sustained fan-signal accumulation
Fan SignalDonation - #20
Jeon So-min93.300–Coverage of a new brand deal
Fan Signal - #21
Kim Ji-woong93.300–Coverage of a public-good campaign
DonationESG - #22
Winter93.200–New brand-deal coverage
BrandSearch Trend - #23
Go Youn-jung93.100–Coverage of a public-good campaign
DonationESG - #24
Kian8493.000–Multiple matched signal labels
Ad CampaignPositive Impact+1 - #25
Lee Young-ji92.900–Shift in search volume detected
Ad CampaignPositive Impact+1 - #26
Lyn92.900–Shift in search volume detected
Ad CampaignPositive Impact+1 - #27
Koo Kyohwan92.800–Shift in search volume detected
Ad CampaignPositive Impact+1 - #28
Uhm Tae-goo92.800–Shift in search volume detected
Ad CampaignPositive Impact+1 - #29
Kim Se-jeong92.700–Increased tier-1 media coverage
DonationESG - #30
ALi92.600–Coverage of a new brand deal
Fan Signal - #31
Kim Jang-hoon92.500–Multiple matched signal labels
Ad CampaignPositive Impact+1 - #32
Song Il-kook92.400–Increased tier-1 media coverage
DonationESG - #33
Seo In-young92.300–Increased tier-1 media coverage
DonationESG - #34
Jimin92.300–Steady fan-signal accumulation
Fan Signal - #35
Park Eun-bin92.100–Steady fan-signal accumulation
Fan Signal - #36
MC Mong92.100–Steady fan-signal accumulation
Fan Signal - #37
Soyou92.100–Coverage of a public-good campaign
DonationESG - #38
Kim Dae-ho92.100–Steady fan-signal accumulation
Fan Signal - #39
Park Si-eun92.100–Increased tier-1 media coverage
DonationESG - #40
Song Hyekyo92.000–Coverage of a new brand deal
Fan Signal - #41
Kim Seok-jin91.800–Steady fan-signal accumulation
Fan Signal - #42
Yoon Do-woon91.800–Shift in search volume detected
Ad CampaignPositive Impact+1 - #43
Sung Si-kyung91.700–Multiple matched signal labels
Ad CampaignPositive Impact+1 - #44
Lee Seung-hwan91.600–Increased tier-1 media coverage
DonationESG - #45
Eunhyuk91.600–Multiple matched signal labels
Ad CampaignPositive Impact+1 - #46
Giselle91.500–Coverage of a public-good campaign
DonationESG - #47
Ra Mi-ran91.400–Multiple matched signal labels
Ad CampaignPositive Impact+1 - #48
Park Seo-joon91.400–Multiple matched signal labels
Ad CampaignPositive Impact+1 - #49
Kim Da-hyun91.400–Coverage of a public-good campaign
DonationESG - #50
Kim Seung-su91.300–Multiple matched signal labels
Ad CampaignPositive Impact+1
| Rank | Celebrity | Type | Score | Score change | 7-day | Signals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fan engagement remained steady | Solo | 97.400 | – | Fan SignalSearch Trend | |
| 2 | Positive Impact boosted by recent donation coverage | Solo | 97.100 | – | Positive ImpactDonationMedia Momentum | |
| 3 | Brand momentum dipped after the campaign ended | Solo | 96.500 | – | BrandAd Campaign | |
| 4 | Search-volume spike drove the overall lift | Solo | 95.900 | – | Search TrendFan Signal | |
| 5 | Coverage of public-good campaign participation | Solo | 95.100 | – | Public GoodPositive Impact | |
| 6 | Increased tier-1 media coverage | Solo | 95.000 | – | DonationESG | |
| 7 | Steady fan-signal accumulation | Solo | 94.900 | – | Fan Signal | |
| 8 | Shift in search volume detected | Solo | 94.700 | – | Ad CampaignPositive ImpactPublic Good | |
| 9 | Multiple matched signal labels | Solo | 94.500 | – | Ad CampaignPositive ImpactPublic Good | |
| 10 | Multiple matched signal labels | Solo | 94.300 | – | Ad CampaignPositive ImpactPublic Good | |
| 11 | Steady fan-signal accumulation | Solo | 94.100 | – | Fan Signal | |
| 12 | Multiple local-volunteer pieces | Solo | 94.000 | – | Positive ImpactPublic Good | |
| 13 | Coverage of a public-good campaign | Solo | 94.000 | – | DonationESG | |
| 14 | Tier-1 media coverage dipped | Solo | 93.900 | – | Media Momentum | |
| 15 | Coverage of a new brand deal | Solo | 93.900 | – | Fan Signal | |
| 16 | Increased tier-1 media coverage | Solo | 93.600 | – | DonationESG | |
| 17 | Day-over-day coverage volume declined | Solo | 93.500 | – | Media Momentum | |
| 18 | Coverage of a new brand deal | Solo | 93.400 | – | Fan Signal | |
| 19 | Sustained fan-signal accumulation | Solo | 93.300 | – | Fan SignalDonation | |
| 20 | Coverage of a new brand deal | Solo | 93.300 | – | Fan Signal | |
| 21 | Coverage of a public-good campaign | Solo | 93.300 | – | DonationESG | |
| 22 | New brand-deal coverage | Solo | 93.200 | – | BrandSearch Trend | |
| 23 | Coverage of a public-good campaign | Solo | 93.100 | – | DonationESG | |
| 24 | Multiple matched signal labels | Solo | 93.000 | – | Ad CampaignPositive ImpactPublic Good | |
| 25 | Shift in search volume detected | Solo | 92.900 | – | Ad CampaignPositive ImpactPublic Good | |
| 26 | Shift in search volume detected | Solo | 92.900 | – | Ad CampaignPositive ImpactPublic Good | |
| 27 | Shift in search volume detected | Solo | 92.800 | – | Ad CampaignPositive ImpactPublic Good | |
| 28 | Shift in search volume detected | Solo | 92.800 | – | Ad CampaignPositive ImpactPublic Good | |
| 29 | Increased tier-1 media coverage | Solo | 92.700 | – | DonationESG | |
| 30 | Coverage of a new brand deal | Solo | 92.600 | – | Fan Signal | |
| 31 | Multiple matched signal labels | Solo | 92.500 | – | Ad CampaignPositive ImpactPublic Good | |
| 32 | Increased tier-1 media coverage | Solo | 92.400 | – | DonationESG | |
| 33 | Increased tier-1 media coverage | Solo | 92.300 | – | DonationESG | |
| 34 | Steady fan-signal accumulation | Solo | 92.300 | – | Fan Signal | |
| 35 | Steady fan-signal accumulation | Solo | 92.100 | – | Fan Signal | |
| 36 | Steady fan-signal accumulation | Solo | 92.100 | – | Fan Signal | |
| 37 | Coverage of a public-good campaign | Solo | 92.100 | – | DonationESG | |
| 38 | Steady fan-signal accumulation | Solo | 92.100 | – | Fan Signal | |
| 39 | Increased tier-1 media coverage | Solo | 92.100 | – | DonationESG | |
| 40 | Coverage of a new brand deal | Solo | 92.000 | – | Fan Signal | |
| 41 | Steady fan-signal accumulation | Solo | 91.800 | – | Fan Signal | |
| 42 | Shift in search volume detected | Solo | 91.800 | – | Ad CampaignPositive ImpactPublic Good | |
| 43 | Multiple matched signal labels | Solo | 91.700 | – | Ad CampaignPositive ImpactPublic Good | |
| 44 | Increased tier-1 media coverage | Solo | 91.600 | – | DonationESG | |
| 45 | Multiple matched signal labels | Solo | 91.600 | – | Ad CampaignPositive ImpactPublic Good | |
| 46 | Coverage of a public-good campaign | Solo | 91.500 | – | DonationESG | |
| 47 | Multiple matched signal labels | Solo | 91.400 | – | Ad CampaignPositive ImpactPublic Good | |
| 48 | Multiple matched signal labels | Solo | 91.400 | – | Ad CampaignPositive ImpactPublic Good | |
| 49 | Coverage of a public-good campaign | Solo | 91.400 | – | DonationESG | |
| 50 | Multiple matched signal labels | Solo | 91.300 | – | Ad CampaignPositive ImpactPublic Good |
Ranks 51 – 100
- 51
Song Yuqi91.300– - 52
Park Jeongmin91.100– - 53
Song Ga-in91.100– - 54
Kim Hye-yoon91.100– - 55
Yoon Taek91.100– - 56
Lee Jae-wook91.000– - 57
J-hope91.000– - 58
Nana90.900– - 59
Kim Da-hyeon90.800– - 60
Jin Tae-hyun90.800– - 61
G-dragon90.700– - 62
Shin Goo90.700– - 63
Sohee90.600– - 64
Choi Hyun-wook90.600– - 65
Shownu90.600– - 66
Han Hye-jin90.500– - 67
Lee Mujin90.500– - 68
Kim Gyu-ri90.400– - 69
Jung Yu-mi90.300– - 70
Oh Jung-se90.200– - 71
Shin Ji90.200– - 72
Ningning90.100– - 73
So Ji-sub90.100– - 74
Gummy90.100– - 75
Shin Ha-kyun90.100– - 76
Im Su-jeong90.000– - 77
Hwang Shin-hye90.000– - 78
Dino90.000– - 79
Jang Yoon-jeong89.900– - 80
Lee Hyun-i89.800– - 81
Choi Woo-shik89.800– - 82
Lee Seung-gi89.700– - 83
Lee Young-ae89.600– - 84
Ko So-young89.400– - 85
Park Ha-sun89.400– - 86
Joy89.300– - 87
BBAEKGA89.300– - 88
Jeong So-yeon89.200– - 89
Kang Mi-na89.200– - 90
Lee Ji-hoon89.100– - 91
Moon Geun-young88.900– - 92
Lee Hyori88.900– - 93
Hong Eun-chae88.800– - 94
Jun Hyun-moo88.700– - 95
Huh Yun-jin88.600– - 96
Kim Do-yeon88.500– - 97
Jang Keun-suk88.500– - 98
Kim Jae-joong88.400– - 99허남Heo Nam-jun88.200–
- 100
I.N88.200–
Data freshness
- Last updated
- 20 hours ago(06/03/2026, 12:10 AM GMT+9)
- Next update
- in 4 hours(06/04/2026, 12:10 AM GMT+9)
- Algorithm version
- v1.0.1[Changelog]
- Data sources
- Naver News, Google News, Naver search volume, On-site fan signals
Backers100 rankings are calculated from public media coverage, search trends, fan signals, positive impact, and momentum data. Some entries may be adjusted through the data review process.