Celebrity influence ranking
Composite influence score from news, search, fan signals, positive impact, and brand momentum.
Filter2▾
- #1
Lim Young-woong97.200–Positive Impact boosted by recent donation coverage
Positive ImpactDonation+1 - #2
Lee Se-young96.600–Fan engagement remained steady
Fan SignalSearch Trend - #3
Ha Jiwon95.200–Multiple local-volunteer pieces
Positive ImpactPublic Good - #4
IU95.100–Brand momentum dipped after the campaign ended
BrandAd Campaign - #5
Lim Ji-yeon95.000–Day-over-day coverage volume declined
Media Momentum - #6
Yoo Hai-jin95.000–Multiple matched signal labels
Ad CampaignPositive Impact+1 - #7
Winter94.500–New brand-deal coverage
BrandSearch Trend - #8
Lee Chanwon94.500–Steady fan-signal accumulation
Fan Signal - #9
Park Bo-young94.400–Search-volume spike drove the overall lift
Search TrendFan Signal - #10
Jeon Somi94.400–Coverage of a new brand deal
Fan Signal - #11
Koo Kyohwan94.300–Shift in search volume detected
Ad CampaignPositive Impact+1 - #12
Gong Myoung94.100–Coverage of a public-good campaign
DonationESG - #13
Kim Go-eun94.000–Sustained fan-signal accumulation
Fan SignalDonation - #14
Jun Ji-hyun93.900–Coverage of public-good campaign participation
Public GoodPositive Impact - #15
Kim Soo-hyun93.800–Increased tier-1 media coverage
DonationESG - #16
Seo In-young93.800–Increased tier-1 media coverage
DonationESG - #17
Chae Jung-an93.600–Tier-1 media coverage dipped
Media Momentum - #18
Song Il-kook93.600–Increased tier-1 media coverage
DonationESG - #19
Jeong Dong-won93.500–Multiple matched signal labels
Ad CampaignPositive Impact+1 - #20
Kim Seok-jin93.400–Steady fan-signal accumulation
Fan Signal - #21
Lee Young-ji93.400–Shift in search volume detected
Ad CampaignPositive Impact+1 - #22
Park Eun-bin93.200–Steady fan-signal accumulation
Fan Signal - #23
Hwang Jung-eum93.100–Shift in search volume detected
Ad CampaignPositive Impact+1 - #24
MC Mong93.000–Steady fan-signal accumulation
Fan Signal - #25
Jeon So-min92.900–Coverage of a new brand deal
Fan Signal - #26
Park Seo-joon92.900–Multiple matched signal labels
Ad CampaignPositive Impact+1 - #27
Ra Mi-ran92.800–Multiple matched signal labels
Ad CampaignPositive Impact+1 - #28
Kim Jang-hoon92.700–Multiple matched signal labels
Ad CampaignPositive Impact+1 - #29
Ji Chang-wook92.700–Steady fan-signal accumulation
Fan Signal - #30
Kim Se-jeong92.700–Increased tier-1 media coverage
DonationESG - #31
Shin Hae-sun92.500–Coverage of a new brand deal
Fan Signal - #32
J-hope92.500–Coverage of a public-good campaign
DonationESG - #33
Go Youn-jung92.400–Coverage of a public-good campaign
DonationESG - #34
Park Jeongmin92.300–Coverage of a public-good campaign
DonationESG - #35
Giselle92.200–Coverage of a public-good campaign
DonationESG - #36
Kim In Seong92.100–Increased tier-1 media coverage
DonationESG - #37
Kim Ji-woong92.100–Coverage of a public-good campaign
DonationESG - #38
Sung Si-kyung92.100–Multiple matched signal labels
Ad CampaignPositive Impact+1 - #39
Lyn92.000–Shift in search volume detected
Ad CampaignPositive Impact+1 - #40
Lee Mujin92.000–Coverage of a new brand deal
Fan Signal - #41
Kim Da-hyeon91.800–Coverage of a new brand deal
Fan Signal - #42
Uhm Tae-goo91.700–Shift in search volume detected
Ad CampaignPositive Impact+1 - #43
Song Hyekyo91.700–Coverage of a new brand deal
Fan Signal - #44
Nana91.700–Coverage of a new brand deal
Fan Signal - #45
Kim Dae-ho91.600–Steady fan-signal accumulation
Fan Signal - #46
Oh Jung-se91.600–Shift in search volume detected
Ad CampaignPositive Impact+1 - #47
Kian8491.400–Multiple matched signal labels
Ad CampaignPositive Impact+1 - #48
So Ji-sub91.400–Shift in search volume detected
Ad CampaignPositive Impact+1 - #49
Choi Woo-shik91.400–Increased tier-1 media coverage
DonationESG - #50
Kim Da-hyun91.400–Coverage of a public-good campaign
DonationESG
| Rank | Celebrity | Type | Score | Score change | 7-day | Signals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Positive Impact boosted by recent donation coverage | Solo | 97.200 | – | Positive ImpactDonationMedia Momentum | |
| 2 | Fan engagement remained steady | Solo | 96.600 | – | Fan SignalSearch Trend | |
| 3 | Multiple local-volunteer pieces | Solo | 95.200 | – | Positive ImpactPublic Good | |
| 4 | Brand momentum dipped after the campaign ended | Solo | 95.100 | – | BrandAd Campaign | |
| 5 | Day-over-day coverage volume declined | Solo | 95.000 | – | Media Momentum | |
| 6 | Multiple matched signal labels | Solo | 95.000 | – | Ad CampaignPositive ImpactPublic Good | |
| 7 | New brand-deal coverage | Solo | 94.500 | – | BrandSearch Trend | |
| 8 | Steady fan-signal accumulation | Solo | 94.500 | – | Fan Signal | |
| 9 | Search-volume spike drove the overall lift | Solo | 94.400 | – | Search TrendFan Signal | |
| 10 | Coverage of a new brand deal | Solo | 94.400 | – | Fan Signal | |
| 11 | Shift in search volume detected | Solo | 94.300 | – | Ad CampaignPositive ImpactPublic Good | |
| 12 | Coverage of a public-good campaign | Solo | 94.100 | – | DonationESG | |
| 13 | Sustained fan-signal accumulation | Solo | 94.000 | – | Fan SignalDonation | |
| 14 | Coverage of public-good campaign participation | Solo | 93.900 | – | Public GoodPositive Impact | |
| 15 | Increased tier-1 media coverage | Solo | 93.800 | – | DonationESG | |
| 16 | Increased tier-1 media coverage | Solo | 93.800 | – | DonationESG | |
| 17 | Tier-1 media coverage dipped | Solo | 93.600 | – | Media Momentum | |
| 18 | Increased tier-1 media coverage | Solo | 93.600 | – | DonationESG | |
| 19 | Multiple matched signal labels | Solo | 93.500 | – | Ad CampaignPositive ImpactPublic Good | |
| 20 | Steady fan-signal accumulation | Solo | 93.400 | – | Fan Signal | |
| 21 | Shift in search volume detected | Solo | 93.400 | – | Ad CampaignPositive ImpactPublic Good | |
| 22 | Steady fan-signal accumulation | Solo | 93.200 | – | Fan Signal | |
| 23 | Shift in search volume detected | Solo | 93.100 | – | Ad CampaignPositive ImpactPublic Good | |
| 24 | Steady fan-signal accumulation | Solo | 93.000 | – | Fan Signal | |
| 25 | Coverage of a new brand deal | Solo | 92.900 | – | Fan Signal | |
| 26 | Multiple matched signal labels | Solo | 92.900 | – | Ad CampaignPositive ImpactPublic Good | |
| 27 | Multiple matched signal labels | Solo | 92.800 | – | Ad CampaignPositive ImpactPublic Good | |
| 28 | Multiple matched signal labels | Solo | 92.700 | – | Ad CampaignPositive ImpactPublic Good | |
| 29 | Steady fan-signal accumulation | Solo | 92.700 | – | Fan Signal | |
| 30 | Increased tier-1 media coverage | Solo | 92.700 | – | DonationESG | |
| 31 | Coverage of a new brand deal | Solo | 92.500 | – | Fan Signal | |
| 32 | Coverage of a public-good campaign | Solo | 92.500 | – | DonationESG | |
| 33 | Coverage of a public-good campaign | Solo | 92.400 | – | DonationESG | |
| 34 | Coverage of a public-good campaign | Solo | 92.300 | – | DonationESG | |
| 35 | Coverage of a public-good campaign | Solo | 92.200 | – | DonationESG | |
| 36 | Increased tier-1 media coverage | Solo | 92.100 | – | DonationESG | |
| 37 | Coverage of a public-good campaign | Solo | 92.100 | – | DonationESG | |
| 38 | Multiple matched signal labels | Solo | 92.100 | – | Ad CampaignPositive ImpactPublic Good | |
| 39 | Shift in search volume detected | Solo | 92.000 | – | Ad CampaignPositive ImpactPublic Good | |
| 40 | Coverage of a new brand deal | Solo | 92.000 | – | Fan Signal | |
| 41 | Coverage of a new brand deal | Solo | 91.800 | – | Fan Signal | |
| 42 | Shift in search volume detected | Solo | 91.700 | – | Ad CampaignPositive ImpactPublic Good | |
| 43 | Coverage of a new brand deal | Solo | 91.700 | – | Fan Signal | |
| 44 | Coverage of a new brand deal | Solo | 91.700 | – | Fan Signal | |
| 45 | Steady fan-signal accumulation | Solo | 91.600 | – | Fan Signal | |
| 46 | Shift in search volume detected | Solo | 91.600 | – | Ad CampaignPositive ImpactPublic Good | |
| 47 | Multiple matched signal labels | Solo | 91.400 | – | Ad CampaignPositive ImpactPublic Good | |
| 48 | Shift in search volume detected | Solo | 91.400 | – | Ad CampaignPositive ImpactPublic Good | |
| 49 | Increased tier-1 media coverage | Solo | 91.400 | – | DonationESG | |
| 50 | Coverage of a public-good campaign | Solo | 91.400 | – | DonationESG |
Ranks 51 – 100
- 51
Lee Jae-wook91.200– - 52
Im Su-jeong91.200– - 53
ALi91.100– - 54
Sohee91.000– - 55
Jimin90.900– - 56
Lee Seung-hwan90.900– - 57
Park Si-eun90.900– - 58
Joy90.900– - 59
Ningning90.800– - 60
Park Ha-sun90.800– - 61
Shin Ha-kyun90.800– - 62
Lee Young-ae90.700– - 63
Eunhyuk90.700– - 64
Soyou90.500– - 65
Kim Hye-yoon90.500– - 66
Choi Hyun-wook90.500– - 67
Hong Eun-chae90.400– - 68
BBAEKGA90.400– - 69
Han Hye-jin90.300– - 70
Lee Hyori90.300– - 71
Dino90.300– - 72
Kim Seung-su90.200– - 73
Yoon Do-woon90.200– - 74
Huh Yun-jin90.200– - 75
Lee Hyun-i90.100– - 76
Song Yuqi89.900– - 77
Song Ga-in89.800– - 78
Yoon Taek89.800– - 79
Shin Goo89.800– - 80
Kim Gyu-ri89.700– - 81
Kim Do-yeon89.700– - 82
Jung Yu-mi89.700– - 83
Moon Geun-young89.600– - 84
I.N89.600– - 85
Jin Tae-hyun89.300– - 86
Ko So-young89.300– - 87
Gummy89.100– - 88
G-dragon89.100– - 89
Shownu89.100– - 90
Jun Hyun-moo89.000– - 91허남Heo Nam-jun89.000–
- 92
Shin Ji88.900– - 93
Hwang Shin-hye88.700– - 94
Jeong So-yeon88.700– - 95
Jang Yoon-jeong88.400– - 96
Jang Keun-suk88.400– - 97
Kang Mi-na88.200– - 98
Lee Seung-gi88.200– - 99
Lee Ji-hoon87.800– - 100
Kim Jae-joong87.800–
Data freshness
- Last updated
- 18 hours ago(06/03/2026, 12:10 AM GMT+9)
- Next update
- in 6 hours(06/04/2026, 12:10 AM GMT+9)
- Algorithm version
- v1.0.1[Changelog]
- Data sources
- Naver News, Google News, Naver search volume, On-site fan signals
Backers100 rankings are calculated from public media coverage, search trends, fan signals, positive impact, and momentum data. Some entries may be adjusted through the data review process.